Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer

By Dan Pinkel, Donna Albertson. Nature Genetics, 2005

628 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e434aae4a80bac57df5dab734c0dac047765e6a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. P. Park
2. B. Johansson
3. Gad Getz
4. F. Mertens
5. F. Mitelman
6. Eric S. Lander
7. Idris Arthur Eckley
8. Rebecca Killick

In Molecular Biology

1. P. Park
2. Eric S. Lander
3. Gad Getz
4. Matthew Meyerson
5. Chad Nusbaum
6. Scott L. Carter
7. David B. Jaffe
8. B. Johansson

In Plant Science

1. P. Park
2. Eric S. Lander
3. B. Johansson
4. F. Mertens
5. F. Mitelman
6. Idris Arthur Eckley
7. Rebecca Killick

Citations in the corpus

• Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data (2005, background): “See Pinkel and Albertson (2005) for a review.”
• High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing (2008, background): “Indeed, hybridization of genomic DNA to oligonucleotide microarrays can reveal genome-wide copy-number change”
• CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing (2016, background): “The gold standard for genome-wide copy number is array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) [1, 2].”
• The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation (2007, methodology): “The advent of molecular cytogenetic techniques, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multicolour FISH and array-based comparative genomic hybridization, has added a further level of sophistication to the analyses in that chromosomal breakpoints involved in structural rearrangements n”