We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects

By Daniel Simberloff. Biological Invasions, 2008

351 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3e5c9c5b4fc856fc40ba51ad7dbb17c0e77b7f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Insect Science

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Managing invasive crayfish: is there a hope? (2011, background): “In general, eradication is seen as an impossible goal (e.g., Bertolino and Genovesi 2003) that might have the capacity to incur ‘‘horrendous non-target impacts’’ (Simberloff 2009).”
Use of DNA barcoding to detect invertebrate invasive species from diapausing eggs (2011, background): “As false negatives often lead to late detection of NIS, they can lead to difficulty in eradication and/or stopping further spread, as well as concurrent increases in operational costs (Bax et al. 2001; Simberloff 2009).”
When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, background): “For example, if managing for the ultimate goal of ecological recovery, eradication may not be necessary given that recovery can occur even when 100% of the invader population is not removed (Simberloff 2009).”
Linear and non-linear impacts of a non-native plant invasion on soil microbial community structure and function (2011, background): “Managers dealing with invasive plants on a limited budget may treat eradication as an unreasonable goal for restoration, and instead try to keep the abundance of invasive species at a reasonably low level (Simberloff 2009).”
Response of non-native lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to 15 years of harvest in Yellowstone Lake, Yellowstone National Park (2011, background): “However, the results of such projects are often not reported in the peer-reviewed literature (Simberloff 2009).”
Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions (2011, background): “In practice, a combination of voluntary agreement and enforced legislation might be required to achieve successful management goals (Simberloff, 2009).”
Coping with the Lionfish Invasion: Can Targeted Removals Yield Beneficial Effects? (2012, background): “…throughout the Caribbean region and a contribution to the broader debate about the potential value of efforts to eradicate or control invaders that are established (Simberloff, 2009; Davis et al., 2011; Alyokhin, 2011; Lerdau and Wickham, 2011; Lockwood et al., 2011; Simberloff et al., 2011).”
What can DNA tell us about biological invasions? (2012, background): “In addition, ecological research has sometimes directly influenced conservation policy and practice (Simberloff 2009).”
Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use (2011, background): “Despite the successful eradication of some invasive alien species (Simberloff, 2009), the costs and likelihood of failure of eradication programmes rise dramatically when invasions are widespread (Hulme, 2006; Simberloff, 2009).”
When are eradication campaigns successful? A test of common assumptions (2012, methodology): “In a next step, we suggest to evaluate the degree of implementation of a contingency or eradication plan: Having the authority to enforce cooperation and dedicated project leaders, thus insuring that an eradication plan is implemented, are also key for success (Simberloff 2009).”
Plant invasions are context‐dependent: multiscale effects of climate, human activity and habitat (2014, background): “It is important to consider the stage of the invasion process when managing new introductions (Simberloff, 2009).”