Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions

By John R. U. Wilson, Carla Gairifo, Michelle R. Gibson, M. Arianoutsou, B. Bakar, Stéphane Baret, L. Celesti‐Grapow, J. Ditomaso, J. Dufour-Dror, Christoph Kueffer and 12 more. 2011

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/365b84f2b119e553cded2e09b53f845e83917916

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Reproductive biology of Australian acacias: important mediator of invasiveness? (2011, background): “Key stages for invasiveness of the reproductive life cycle of Australian acacias are useful to identify to determine options for the intervention to reduce success and achieve management objectives (Wilson et al., 2011).”
Phylogeographic consequences of different introduction histories of invasive Australian Acacia species and Paraserianthes lophantha (Fabaceae) in South Africa (2011, background): “2), and others still are limited to only one or two sites (Zenni et al., 2009; Wilson et al., 2011).”
The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species (2011, background): “The high level of Acacia use worldwide is expected to provide an opportunity for other species to become invasive in the future (Wilson et al., 2011).”
Species‐based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges (2013, background): “…species need a separate RA system, (ii) many species are classified as ‘evaluate further’, (iii) cut-off levels for the different categories of risk are not constant for different purposes and (iv) levels of risk for some closely related taxa cannot be determined (e.g. Acacia; Wilson et al., 2011).”
Human‐mediated introductions of Australian acacias – a global experiment in biogeography (2011, background): “Similarly, the long history of management in some countries, but relatively recent initiation of interventions in others, creates an ideal situation for exchanging lessons and building generalizations for best practice (Le Maitre et al., 2011; Moore et al., 2011; van Wilgen et al., 2011; Wilson et a”
Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges (2017, background): “…example where a ‘‘global network for invasion science’’ (Packer et al. 2017) is needed to forge local solutions that draw on outcomes of successes and failures around the world in dealing with Pinaceae invasions (see Wilson et al. 2011 for a similar approach for Australian Acacia species).”
Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use (2011, background): “These predictions are particularly relevant to species groups such as Australian acacias, given their high ecological and economic impact world-wide (Weber, 2003; Le Maitre et al., 2011; Wilson et al. 2011).”
Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration (2011, background): “They include measures to prevent introductions, efforts to detect and eradicate new invaders, biological control and various efforts aimed at mitigating impacts (Pyšek & Richardson, 2010; Wilson et al., 2011).”
Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review (2011, background): “These range from ad hoc local-scale efforts to control invasions and mitigate their effects, to national-scale, systematic strategies that integrate all potential options for reducing current problems and reducing the risk of future problems (van Wilgen et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2011).”