Improving Attitude-Behavior Correspondence Through Exposure to Normative Support From a Salient Ingroup

By Katherine M. White, M. Hogg, D. Terry. 2002

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3934aeb9ed5dd026d92ea3dc9546d3377cda356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Choosing to belong: The influence of choice on social identification and psychological sense of community (2007, background): “Further, salience checks, taken from White et al. (2002), were included at the end of the questionnaire, and salience entered as a covariate in all analyses.”
Binge-Drinking: A Test of the Role of Group Norms in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (2003, unknown): “…models becomes stronger under conditions in which people categorise themselves and identify with an in-group that defines membership in terms of specific behaviourally and attitudinally prescriptive norms (Terry and Hogg, 1996; Wellen et al., 1998; Terry et al., 1999; White et al., 2002).”
The psychology of whistleblowing (2015, background): “As a result, attempts to encourage whistleblowing solely by prioritizing the need to root out criminal activity or organizational injustice may only encourage employees who are low in loyalty at baseline to blow the whistle [18,32–34,35 ,36].”
Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective (2007, background): “…colleagues (e.g., Fielding et al., in press; Louis et al., 2007; Smith & Terry, 2003; Terry & Hogg, 1996; Terry et al., 1999a; Terry et al., 2000a; Wellen et al., 1998; White et al., 2002; see Terry et al., 2000b, for a review), and the strategic self-presentation studies by Smith et al. (2007a).”
Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. (2006, background): “Other findings by Smith and Terry (2003) and White, Hogg, and Terry (2002) discussed the influence of in-group norms on the attitude– behavior relation.”
From normative influence to social pressure: how relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying (2016, background): “…Perspective on social norms (Terry & Hogg, 1996; White, Hogg, & Terry, 2002) helps us distinguish between normative social influence of different peer groups, by emphasising ‘the importance of normative support from salient self-inclusive group memberships’ (White et al., 2002, p. 92).”