The OECD Survey of Adult Skills (特集国際成人力調査からの知見)

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measurement of Digital Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Review (2020, methodology): “…chose the DigComp over other frameworks, such as the International Computer and Information Literacy Study [19] and OECD’s Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies [20] because the DigComp Framework is the most generalizable across different regions [21] and age groups [15].”
Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance (2018, methodology): “If we had anticipated that more than 30,000 students would participate, we could have pooled more items, a strategy used in international assessments such as PISA (OECD, 2012) and PIAAC (PIAAC Numeracy Expert Group, 2009).”
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health. (2020, background): “The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines literacy as “the ability to understand, evaluate, use, and engage with written texts to participate in society, achieve one’s goals, and develop one’s knowledge and potential” (47, p. 20).”