An Experimental Investigation of Syntactic Satiation Effects

By W. Snyder. Linguistic Inquiry, 2000

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “This parallelism effect may of course be a result of the coordinate structure, as in Frazier et al. (1984, 2000).”
Continuous Acceptability, Categorical Grammaticality, and Experimental Syntax (2007, background): “It has long been anec- Biolinguistics Forum 125 dotally reported that judgments tend to get better over time, a phenomenon that Snyder (2000) calls syntactic satiation.”
The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, unknown): “It is also possible to control for effects of previous exposure or judgments (sentences appearing more or less acceptable when the construction is repeated; e.g., Levelt 1972; Luka and Barsalou 2005; Snyder 2000) – a phenomenon which is presumably related to structural priming.”
Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing (2004, background): “The fillers included a number of cases which prior research has identified as ungrammatical to varying degrees, including extractions from whether-islands and extractions from subject islands (Braze, 2002; Snyder, 2000).”