Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences
By J. Joireman, David E. Sprott, Eric R. Spangenberg. 2005
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2898649051f362e451e2f3a344c284e117f97c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- J. Joireman
- David E. Sprott
- Daniel Balliet
- Jen Schultz
- J. Alba
- Lisa E. Bolton
- Eric R. Spangenberg
- Abdullah J. Sultan
In General Decision Sciences
In Social Psychology
- J. Joireman
- David E. Sprott
- Daniel Balliet
- Abdullah J. Sultan
- Jen Schultz
- J. Alba
- Lisa E. Bolton
- Eric R. Spangenberg
Citations in the corpus
- Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales (2008, background): “Not surprisingly, past research has shown an inverse relationship between scores on the CFC scale and temporal discounting (Joireman et al., 2005).”
- Building consumer self-control: The effect of self-control exercises on impulse buying urges (2012, background): “Along these lines, researchers have linked lower levels of impulse buying to personality traits related to self-control, including conscientiousness (Verplanken and Herabadi 2001), consideration of future consequences ( Joireman et al. 2005 ), and elaboration on potential outcomes (Nenkov et al. 200”
- When less is more: Consumer aversion to unused utility (2012, background): “The extent to which consumers consider future consequences has been linked to a variety of phenomenon, including persuasion, un/healthy behaviors, aggression, and fiscal responsibility (Strathman et al., 1994; Joireman, Anderson, & Strathman, 2003; Joireman & Sprott, 2005).”