Experimental Methods and Elicitation of Values

By Glenn W. Harrison. 2004

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1666d6e9372481eaaf7aa45d48019a28d3a8ad7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Preference Elicitation under Oath (2010, unknown): “This is enough to protect our data from the censoring issue raised by, e.g, Harrison et al. (2004), if all actual offers are below the market price (which is far from being the case in the experiment, see Section 4.3 below).”
Developing country consumers’ acceptance of biofortified foods: a synthesis (2015, unknown): “Harrison et al. (2004) and List (2003, 2011) coined these types of revealed preference experimental settings (such as revealed choice experiments, experimental auctions and auction-like mechanisms) as framed field experiments when the methods are adapted to real markets, thus distinguishing them…”
Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment (2013, background): “been referred to in the experimental literature as the ‘field price censoring’ which reflects the fact that the values elicited in the laboratory are censored by the field market price (Harrison et al. 2004).”
Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice (2009, background): “For example, Harrison, Harstad, and Rutström (2004) present evidence suggesting that experimental auction participants take into account field alternatives when formulating bids.”
2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys (2014, background): “…may understate WTP, while the hypothetical donation payment may overstate WTP. Likewise, in private good experiments, respondents’ maximum WTP may be truncated by their assessment of the price for which a similar good sells in the market (Harrison, 2006; Harrison, Harstad, and Rutstrom, 2004).”
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis (2005, background): “This question was recently raised by Harrison et al. (2004).”
Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods (2006, unknown): “, Harrison et al. [2004]). Coller and Williams [1999] provide test for hypothetical bias in the MPL format, and find that it exists.”
Economic Theory and Experimental Economics (2005, background): “the consequences of those choices, or some other aspect of the process by which choices are made or values identified? See Harrison, Harstad and Rutström [107] for a discussion”