Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups.

By U. Piontkowski, Arnd Florack, Paul Hoelker, Peter Obdrzálek. 2000

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e158b18aa11e7be3979f656d4a2cb291b9ca6896

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Hanna Zagefka
2. Rupert Brown
3. C. Ward
4. John W. Berry
5. J. Wilson
6. Larissa Kus
7. R. Bourhis
8. Arnd Florack

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Hanna Zagefka
2. Rupert Brown
3. C. Ward
4. John W. Berry
5. Larissa Kus
6. R. Bourhis
7. J. Wilson
8. Anette Rohmann

Citations in the corpus

• Majority Acculturation Orientations Toward “Valued” and “Devalued” Immigrants (2001, background): “…acculturation attitudes of German and Swiss host majority members also found strong preference for the integrationist orientation relative to the assimilationist orientation, though individualism, segregationism, and exclusionism were not directly assessed in this study (Piontkowski et al., 2000).”
• The Dynamics of Acculturation: An Intergroup Perspective (2011, background): “And perceived intergroup similarity has also been found to be linked to acculturation attitudes in at least three different European contexts (Piontkowski et al., 2000).”
• A Psychology of Immigration (2001, background): “features set them apart from the receiving society (e.g., Turks in Germany) may experience prejudice and discrimination and thus be reluctant to pursue assimila tion in order to avoid being rejected (Berry, Kim, Power, Young, & Bujaki, 1989; Piontkowski, Florack, Hoelker, & Obdrzalek, 2000 ).”
• Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation (2005, methodology): “(Piontkowski & Florack, 1995; Piontkowski et al., 2000; Piontkowski et al., 2002) have made an initial attempt to combine elements from the Berry and Bourhis models discussed above in a European context.”
• Concordance of Acculturation Attitudes and Perceived Threat (2002, background): “However, since the Piontkowski et al. (2000) study was not originally designed to test the predictions of the concordance model, the findings are open to alternative explanations.”
• Contextual influences on acculturation processes: The roles of family, community and society (2010, background): “Conversely, the desire for traditional culture maintenance and endorsement of separation has been found to be signifi cantly higher in immigrant samples with preferences for integration or separation, depending on public-private domain distinctions (Arends-Toth & Van de Vijver, 2003; Piontkowski, F”