Concordance of Acculturation Attitudes and Perceived Threat
By U. Piontkowski, Anette Rohmann, Arnd Florack. 2002
239 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30ae628e31817273d999386044a4f0b169aaa71c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Dynamics of Acculturation: An Intergroup Perspective (2011, methodology): “In our minority and majority samples in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Belgium, we not only measured own preference for culture maintenance and adoption but also perceived outgroup preferences, allowing us to test longitudinally the effects of attitude discrepancies on negative intergroup emotions”
- Contextual influences on acculturation processes: The roles of family, community and society (2010, background): “more ingroup bias (Zagefka & Brown, 2002), less tolerance and poorer intergroup relations (Pfafferott & Brown, 2006), and greater perceived threat ( Piontkowski, Rohmann & Florack, 2002; Rohmann, Florack & Piontkowski, 2006; Rohmann, Piontkowski & van Randenborgh, 2008).”
- A review of the acculturation experiences of international students (2011, background): “Piontkowski, Rohmann, and Florack (2002) xpanded on the IAM to develop the concordance model of acculturation (CMA), which specifically outlines four concordance utcomes (consensual, culture-problematic, contact-problematic, and conflictual) produced from different possibilities of atch or mismatch…”
- Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation (2005, methodology): “(Piontkowski & Florack, 1995; Piontkowski et al., 2000; Piontkowski et al., 2002) have made an initial attempt to combine elements from the Berry and Bourhis models discussed above in a European context.”