A Psychology of Immigration

By John W. Berry. 2001

1,576 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4569201b50e6b17beb08decfc1b3cc08130100b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Verkuyten
2. F. Rudmin
3. Nnenna Ndika
4. J. Phinney
5. D. Sam
6. P. Vedder
7. W. Vollebergh
8. A. Crijnen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Crocetti
2. W. Meeus
3. K. Luyckx
4. D. Sam
5. Nnenna Ndika
6. J. Phinney
7. M. Verkuyten
8. P. Vedder

Citations in the corpus

• Identity Formation in Early and Middle Adolescents From Various Ethnic Groups: From Three Dimensions to Five Statuses (2008, background): “These findings can be understood through considering the issue of acculturation (Berry 2001, 2005).”
• Acculturation (2013, background): “From the ethnic minority perspective, Berry (2001) described assimilation as the willingness to adapt to the host culture at the expense of losing one’s cultural heritage and identity.”
• Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. (2005, background): “Berry (1984, 2001) has argued that multicultural ideology is society’s counterpart to individual-level acculturation strategies of integration.”
• Critical History of the Acculturation Psychology of Assimilation, Separation, Integration, and Marginalization (2003, background): “If acculturative types are defined by choices of three cultures (Birman & Tyler, 1994) or defined by choices of two cultures and by whether the choices are freely made versus imposed (Berry, 1974, 2001), then m 3, and there are 28 256 logically defined types of acculturation.”
• The Interpretation of Multiracial Status and Its Relation to Social Engagement and Psychological Well‐Being (2009, background): “…the implications of multiracial identity both for the individual and for the groups to which they belong (see Shih & Sanchez, 2005; also see Berry, 2001), our choice of dependent variables focused on psychological outcomes pertaining to multiracial individuals’ mental health and well-being…”
• Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences (2009, neutral): “Thus, multicultural ideals also infuse US political dialogue, making diversity an objective (Berry, 2001), which might lead US perceivers to differentiate groups on more than one evaluative dimension.”