Majority Acculturation Orientations Toward “Valued” and “Devalued” Immigrants
By Annie Montreuil, R. Bourhis. 2001
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ab41ebd3fada7f386ad63145d32ef0024c24a51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- F. Rudmin
- Sun-mee Kang
- C. Ward
- Tiane L. Lee
- Susan T. Fiske
- Ronald Schmidt
- Shaha El-Geledi
- G. Barrette
Citations in the corpus
- Hybrid and Alternating Identity Styles as Strategies for Managing Multicultural Identities (2018, methodology): “Moreover, although majority-group Israelis support integration for Jewish immigrants, they tend to prefer segregationist and exclusionist approaches toward indigenous Arabs (Bourhis & Dayan, 2004; Montreuil & Bourhis, 2001).”
- Acculturation Orientations and Social Relations Between Immigrant and Host Community Members in California (2009, background): “…may endorse different acculturation orientations toward immigrant minorities they consider “valued” or somewhat “devalued” (Bourhis & Dayan, 2004; Montreuil & Bourhis, 2001). as noted in recent overviews, most acculturation studies focused on either immigrant minorities or on dominant host…”
- Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model (2006, background): “Majority members’ preferred acculturation style depended on whether the immigrant group is ‘‘devalued’’ or valued’’ (Montreuil & Bourhis, 2001).”
- Critical History of the Acculturation Psychology of Assimilation, Separation, Integration, and Marginalization (2003, methodology): “The usual end is to find evidence that integration is most preferred and most adaptive such that it can be recommended (e.g., Berry, 1974; Berry et al., 1977; Montreuil & Bourhis, 2001; Williams & Berry, 1998).”
- Measurement of Acculturation, Scale Formats, and Language Competence (2006, background): “…the underlying two dimensions (attitudes toward ethnic and mainstream cultures), Berry and his colleagues developed four separate acculturation measures: the integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization tests (Berry et al., 1987; Berry et al., 1989; Montreuil & Bourhis, 2001).”