Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar.

By Theo Vosse, Gerard Kempen. Cognition, 2000

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e14e94b9579308a8a9b685ccc63ca2c7894311e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. (2007, result): “The authors interpreted their results as support for a constraint– satisfaction approach to parsing in which locally consistent fragments can create competition for the global parse (MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Stevenson, 1994, 1998; Tabor & Hutchins, 2004; Vosse & Kempen, 2000 ).”
Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. (2005, methodology): “However, other models also employ competition as a mechanism of ambiguity resolution (e.g., Stevenson , 1994; Vosse & Kempen, 2000).”
Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure (2008, background): “This, combined with a unification-based parser based on competitive inhibition, where candidate links that are incompatible compete for inclusion in the final parse by sending each other inhibitory signals that reduce the competitor’s attachment strength (Vosse and Kempen, 2000), promises a model of”
Neural reflections of meaning in gesture, language, and action (2009, background): “Such views are not inconsistent with our account, since selection is a necessary aspect of unification, as we have argued elsewhere and as is specified in explicit computational models of unification (Vosse and Kempen 2000; Hagoort 2005a).”
An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval (2005, methodology): “Of the prior computational sentence-processing theories, the ACT–R model bears the most resemblance to other hybrid symbolic activation-based models, including the competition model of Stevenson (1994), the inhibition model of Vosse and Kempen (2000), and CAPS/CC-Reader (Just & Carpenter, 1992).”
Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension (2005, background): “…in natural language learning, and statistical frequency or probability distributions of syntactic parameters have been assigned an important role in parsing strategies (e.g., Crocker & Brants, 2000; Johnson & Riezler, 2002; Jurafsky, 1996, 2003; Trueswell & Tanenhaus, 1994; Vosse & Kempen, 2000).”
An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. (2008, neutral): “…in which non-syntactic information typesmayplay a crucial role in selecting oneparticular reading over another, but these readings are nonetheless associated with different syntactic structures (e.g. Hagoort, 2005; MacDonald et al., 1994; Trueswell and Tanenhaus, 1994; Vosse and Kempen, 2000).”
An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese (2008, methodology): “Based on Vosse and Kempen’s (2000) parsing model and a meta-analysis of ERP studies, Hagoort (2003, 2005) proposed that the anterior negativity is triggered by a failure to find an appropriate way to link an incoming word into the phrasal structure built for the sentence so far.”
Journal of Memory and Language (2001, methodology): “This prediction is made by s rial models which incorporate an explicit RAL principle (Fodor & Frazier, 1980: Frazier, 197 Sturt & Crocker, 1996), and it is also made Vosse and Kempen’s Competitive Inhibitio model (Vosse & Kempen, 2000).”
When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production (2001, background): “…is represented in terms of lexical frames store in the lexicon associated with the correspondin lemmas: Kempen, in preparation; McDonald al., 1994; Vosse & Kempen, 2000), this sug gests a certain degree of interaction betwe conceptual and grammatical encoding by virtu of the fact that the same…”
Becoming syntactic. (2006, neutral): “…1996; Garnsey, Pearlmutter, Myers, & Lotocky, 1997; Levelt et al., 1999; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Pickering & Branigan, 1998; Vosse & Kempen, 2000), and language acquisition theories often emphasize the lexical nature of early syntax (Bates & Goodman, 2001; Bowerman, 1976;…”