Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution.

By Roger P. G. van Gompel, Martin J. Pickering, Jamie Pearson, Simon P. Liversedge. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fc25ec169fb77fceb5c63a13a61a8987cbb6c2e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Roger Levy
2. W. Mak
3. Frank Keller
4. Christopher D. Manning
5. T. Florian Jaeger
6. Shravan Vasishth
7. S. Piantadosi
8. Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Roger Levy
2. Wietske Vonk
3. W. Mak
4. Herbert Schriefers
5. Frank Keller
6. T. Florian Jaeger
7. Shravan Vasishth
8. S. Piantadosi

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Roger Levy
2. Wietske Vonk
3. W. Mak
4. Herbert Schriefers

Citations in the corpus

• Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. (2008, background): “…NP/VP attachment ambiguities, and by van Gompel et al. (2005) for NPs postmodified by progressive participial VPs. Traxler et al. (1998); van Gompel et al. (2001, 2005) have argued that these reading patterns are problematic for parallel competition-based accounts, according to which an…”
• Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush (2006, background): “In contrast to this account, the unrestricted race model (Traxler, Pickering, & Clifton, 1998; Van Gompel, Pickering, & Traxler, 2001; Van Gompel, Pickering, Pearson, & Liversedge, 2005 ) assumes that the choice of the parser is variable.”