Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene

By Bruno Laeng, Dinu-Stefan Teodorescu. Cognitive Sciences, 2002

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e123e248e75252418876e0fabf06b93acc213b4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Perception and imagination: amodal perception as mental imagery (2010, background): “Given the similarities between perception and imagery (see Kosslyn 1980; Laeng and Teodorescu 2002; O’Craven and Kanwisher 2000), it is hardly surprising that the same is true for the way we visualize objects.”
Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. (2004, background): “For example, visual imagery selectively interferes with visual perception more than auditory perception (and vice versa [8,54]), more time is required to scan greater distances across visualized objects [9,34], and eye movements during imagery are similar to those made during perception [42].”
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing (2009, background): “…of goal-directed eye movements in the absence of anything in the visual field to move the eyes toward (cf. also demonstrations in Altmann, 2004; Brandt & Stark, 1997; Hoover & Richardson, 2008; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007; Laeng & Teodorecu, 2002; Richardson & Spivey, 2000; Spivey & Geng, 2001).”
Comparing scanpaths during scene encoding and recognition : A multi-dimensional approach (2012, methodology): “These two algorithms have been used extensively elsewhere (Brandt & Stark, 1997; Humphrey & Underwood, 2010; Laeng & Teodorescu, 2002; Mannan, Kennard, & Husain, 2009), but their weaknesses have also been pointed out (Cristino, Mathot, Theeuwes, & Gilchrist, 2009; Jarodzka, Holmqvist, & Nystrom,…”
Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving (2007, methodology): “Eye movements have been used to study visual imagery processes (Brandt & Stark, 1997; Spivey & Geng, 2001; Laeng & Teodorescu, 2002) as well as cognitive processes underlying visual/spatial tasks, such as mental rotation (Carpenter & Just, 1986) mechanical reasoning (Hegarty, 1992), and graph…”
Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective (2011, background): “Similarly, Laeng and Teodorescu (2002) reported two experiments in which participants first inspected a visual scene and were then asked to imagine the visual scene while looking at a blank screen.”
Examining the Relationship between Construction Workers’ Visual Attention and Situation Awareness under Fall and Tripping Hazard Conditions: Using Mobile Eye Tracking (2018, background): “Previous studies have argued widely that scan paths reveal considerable information about visual attention and other underlying cognitive processes involved in eye movements (Laeng and Teodorescu 2002; Raschke et al. 2014).”
Perceptual content and the content of mental imagery (2015, background): “When we visualize a scene, our spontaneous eye movements reflect the content of the visual scene (Brandt and Stark 1997; Laeng and Teodorescu 2002; Mast and Kosslyn 2002; Spivey and Geng 2001; Johansson et al. 2006; Altmann 2004, see also Laeng et al. 2014 for a good summary).”