Institutional change and the uses and limits of path dependency: The case of German finance
By Richard Deeg. 2001
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1230ba22a3593cb822854bd247e4a6f9062b7ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Overcoming path dependency: path generation in open systems (2007, background): “This idea is akin to the concept of “first mover advantage.” Increasing returns can be explained by high initial or set-up costs, learning and coordination effects, and adaptive expectations, e.g., when actors stick to particular institutions because they expect others to adopt or support them as we”
- The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem (2009, background): “…types, they should distinguish policy developments that move in slightly different directions over time but never deviate much from the status quo (policies in equilibrium), from those that move in the same (new) direction over time (cumulative change) (Goldstone 1998, Pierson 2000, Deeg 2001).”
- Changes in Corporate Governance of German Corporations: Convergence to the Anglo-American Model? (2003, background): “The number of companies listed on the stock market has increased very slightly as has listing on foreign markets, and the proportion of shares owned by foreign institutional investors increased from 4% in 1990 to 13% in 1998 (Deeg, 2001: 27, footnote 39).”
- Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time (2006, background): “For detailed critiques see Deeg, 2001 and Kay, 2005.”
- Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety (2007, background): “For example, in many economies, regulatory reforms now offer distinct new sets of rules for globally-oriented firms, which firms can opt into if they so desire (Deeg 2001; Gilson and Milhaupt 2004).”