Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time

By Michael Howlett, J. Rayner. 2006

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68cdbd9d98edbea3da654e71aa8a1d70a363dc14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ron Martin
2. Adrian Smith
3. P. Sunley
4. Andrew Stirling
5. I. Scoones
6. J. Essletzbichler
7. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
8. E. Stam

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Sunley
2. Adrian Smith
3. Andrew Stirling
4. Ron Martin
5. Sigrid Stagl
6. I. Scoones
7. H. El Bilali
8. J. Essletzbichler

Citations in the corpus

• The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape (2010, background): “This proliferation of path dependence ideas can itself be interpreted as a reflection of what some have referred to as an ‘historical turn’ in the social and cognate sciences (Abbott, 2001; Mahoney and Rueschemeyer , 2003: Howlett and Rayner, 2006).”
• Dynamic Systems and the Challenge of Sustainability (2007, background): “Each perspective has its pros and cons, and these are much debated in the literature (e.g. Howlett and Rayner, 2006).”