Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options

By Manfred Lenzen, Chris Dey. 2002

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dff2e51aba7ca24eaddb82f58d0fa8db8205e1c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Solow meets Leontief: Economic growth and energy consumption (2010, background): “The relationships between the economic agents are established in the input-output framework, which eliminate the necessity to model such 2For other studies and references, see Lenzen and Dey (2002), Morán and González (2007), Ma and Stern (2008) and Bartz and Kelly (2008). complex interactions.”
THE LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTION (2011, background): “The case of Australia demonstrates that land use change can have a significant contribution to the carbon footprint of agriculture (Lenzen and Dey, 2002).”
Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, background): “…the Leontief inverse (Leontief, 1970), which transforms direct emissions intensities, V , into supply chain emissions intensities, Z [1×428], assuming constant, national average prices, constant returns to scale, and linear production functions, which assume zero ﬁ xed costs (Lenzen and Dey, 2002).”
What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions (2013, unknown): “…intensity (Girod and De Haan, 2010), the typical ﬁnding is that lower energy intensity of goods it mostly due to a labour-energy trade-oﬀ that is eliminated when one considers the inputs required for labour supply (Costanza, 1980; Maddala, 1965; Karunaratne, 1981; Lenzen and Dey, 2002).”
Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households (2010, methodology): “ELESA is used to model future GHG emissions for three scenarios (Reference, Low and High): • ‘Reference’ Case: This is like a ‘business as usual’ scenario, where the assumptions for the change in household disposable income, prices (both in constant terms), temperature, EXNEF and carbon intensities…”
Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting (2005, background): “, 2001), ecological footprinting (Lenzen and Murray, 2001), life cycle analysis (Lenzen, 2002), and consumer choice (Lenzen and Dey, 2002).”
A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: An application to the US residential energy demand (2015, background): “In addition, it should be pointed out that our results are even lower than those obtained in several papers -such as Lenzen and Dey (2002), Alfredsson (2004) or Mizobuchi (2008)- that also get large direct and indirect rebound effects, even reaching effects larger than 100%, i.e. backfire outcomes.”
Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UKhouseholds (2012, unknown): “Lenzen and Day (2002)”