Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UKhouseholds

By Mona Chitnis, S. Sorrell, Angela Druckman, Steven Firth, Tim Jackson. 2012

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/994c1501c30f1a9ea65bab0466fe16bdd76c8a4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, methodology): “…effect ﬁ nd, not surprisingly, that the higher capital cost of ef ﬁ cient technologies may lower the extent of the direct and indirect rebound effects (Chitnis et al., 2012; Henly et al., 1988; Mizobuchi, 2008; Nässén and Holmberg, 2009; Wirl, 1997) although methods for incorporation of capital…”
How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach (2016, background): “Some authors, however, reflect on the risk that the EU ETS and other schemes would discourage efficiency improvements and in some cases actually induce increases in overall energy and GHG emissions because allowances remain constant irrespective of the overall efficiency of the affected system (Chit”
Evaluating the evaluations: Evidence from energy efficiency programmes in Germany and the UK (2013, unknown): “efficiency measures arrived at much lower figures of 5–15% for direct and indirect rebound effects [66].”
Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda (2017, background): “Studies on rebound effects have shown that the reduction in energy savings due to direct and indirect rebound ranges from 0 to 15% (Berkhout, Muskens, and velthuijsen 2000; Chitnis et al. 2013; Murray 2013).”
Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target (2018, background): “A commonly cited example is that the emission reductions due to the use of more efficient cars, which require less fuel and therefore cause lower costs, may be partially compensated by increased driving [62,92 ,93,95].”
Low carbon lifestyles: A framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints (2016, background): “Savings will also be associated with GHG emissions as they may end up in deferred consumption or as a source of funds for investment (Chitnis et al., 2013).”