Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting

By Barney Foran, Manfred Lenzen, Chris Dey, M. Bilek. 2005

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fcd879fe9ff0f6571627d43c52cdd38cdc6105e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS (2009, unknown): “…applications of IOMs to carbon footprinting are often well suited for tracking sector performance in benchmarking exercises (e.g. Lenzen, 2003; Foran et al., 2005a), the identiﬁcation of sectoral carbon hotspots (e.g. Lenzen, 2003; Foran et al., 2005b, Peters and Hertwich, 2006b) and priority…”
Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: An intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method (2014, methodology): “[10,11] integrated the EIO analysis with environmental, economic, and social metrics for 135 sectors of the Australian economy.”
The Global MRIO Lab – charting the world economy (2017, methodology): “…matrix reconciliation engine (Lenzen et al., 2009); (4) a visual diagnostics suite (Lenzen et al., 2013); and (5) an analytical toolbox including software for undertaking life-cycle assessment (LCA) and various environmental footprints (Foran et al., 2005; Wiedmann et al., 2009).”
Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives (2017, background): “In the literature, a few researchers have broadened the scope of indicators and system boundary simultaneously using an IO analysis, which is capable to quantify not only environmental pressures, but also social and economic impacts at macro level [120,121].”
DISAGGREGATING INPUT–OUTPUT MODELS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION (2012, background): “Gallego and Lenzen (2009) as well as Foran et al. (2005) have covered the aggregation mismatch of environmental satellite accounts in IO tables, a problem that frequently occurs in environmental IO analysis, and proposed coping strategies.”
Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda (2017, background): “In this context, it has been noted that “if you can't measure, you can't manage” (Foran et al., 2005).”
AGGREGATION VERSUS DISAGGREGATION IN INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (2011, background): “In such cases, researchers have sometimes undertaken labour-intensive collections of additional more detailed, often unpublished monetary data, in order to match environmental data with equally detailed input–output data (Foran et al., 2005; Gallego and Lenzen, 2009).”
Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles (2014, methodology): “In the TBL-LCA model, an industry-by-industry I-O methodology was utilized, which was also used in previous I-O based TBL models developed for economies of the UK and Australia [60,61].”
A Review of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Canada (2012, methodology): “…and Poist (2002), Maignan et al. (2002), Deakin (2002), Carter and Jennings (2002), Zhu and Sarkis (2004), Chen (2005), Facanha and Horvath (2005), Foran et al. (2005), Michelsen et al. (2006), Maloni and Brown (2006), Seyfang (2006), Tsoulfas and Pappis (2006), Matos and Hall (2007), Koplin et…”
Companies on the Scale (2009, methodology): “…individual businesses, larger product groups, households, government, the average citizen, or an average member of a particular socioeconomic group can easily be performed through input−output analysis (Foran et al. 2005a; SEI et al. 2006; Wiedmann et al. 2006; Junnila 2008; Matthews et al. 2008b).”