Day-to-Day Variability in Empathy as a Function of Daily Events and Mood
By J. Nezlek, Gregory J. Feist, F. Wilson, R. Plesko. 2001
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfc4b7af48845c6381c240ffff5df26f305596b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- R. Ilies
- Brent A. Scott
- J. Colquitt
- T. Judge
- Matthew D. Lieberman
- Jamil Zaki
- Fabiola H. Gerpott
- Anne Burmeister
In Clinical Psychology
- R. Ilies
- T. Judge
- Brent A. Scott
- J. Colquitt
- Matthew D. Lieberman
- Jamil Zaki
- Sylvia A. Morelli
- J. Bono
In Social Psychology
- R. Ilies
- Brent A. Scott
- T. Judge
- Jamil Zaki
- J. Colquitt
- Adam M. Grant
- Fred Walumbwa
- Matthew D. Lieberman
Citations in the corpus
- A daily investigation of the role of manager empathy on employee well-being (2010, background): “, 1988), empathic responses themselves are more state-like and emotional in nature (Nezlek et al., 2001) and thus by definition are contextualized (Ekman & Davidson, 1994).”
- The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior (2006, background): “... mood, individuals perceive things in a positive light and thus are more likely to feel positively toward coworkers and help them when the opportunity is present (George & Brief, 1992); (2) positive mood facilitates creativity (Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987), and thus people are more likely to p”
- The Emerging Study of Positive Empathy (2015, background): “For example, past studies increased positive empathy by training individuals to respond enthusiastically to others ’ positive event disclosures (e.g., “ I ’ m really happy for you ” ) (Reis et al., 2010).”
- Respectful leadership and followers’ knowledge sharing: A social mindfulness lens (2020, background): “The assumed variability is consistent with scholarly work that has emphasized intraindividual variability in perspective taking (Parker and Axtell, 2001) and in empathic concern (Nezlek et al., 2001).”