Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies

By Andrew Delios, W. Henisz. 2000

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df9cac963341fb4e8a006fe77d38cd280e6de359

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions (2012, background): “Other influential country-level factors include political risk (Delios & Beamish, 1999), political hazards (Delios & Henisz, 2000), and economic and institutional development (Meyer, 2001).”
Uncertainty, Imitation, and Plant Location: Japanese Multinational Corporations, 1990‐1996 (2001, background): “…information regarding a country's culture, its common business practices, preferences of consumers, the process of policymaking, the preferences of key public and private actors and the likelihood of policy change (Barkema, et al., 1996; Delios and Henisz, 2000; Chang and Rosenzweig, 2001).”
Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies (2007, background): “Past studies testing for institutional effects on entry modes cover issues related to political hazards (Delios and Henisz, 2000), legal restrictions on foreign ownership (Delios and Beamish, 1999; Yiu and Makino, 2002) and country risks (Brouthers et al.”
Internalization advantage and subsidiary performance: The role of business group affiliation and host country characteristics (2019, positive): “…the labor market and relying on expatriate PCNs rather than HCNs. MNCs can mitigate the transaction costs arising out of institutional weaknesses by either avoiding a particular host country or devising entry modes to minimize their equity exposure in high-risk countries (Delios & Henisz, 2000).”
Challenging the Conceptualization and Measurement of Distance and International Experience in Entry Mode Choice Research (2009, methodology): “…(n.s.) Delios and Beamish (1999) Subsidiary, % (s) Years (s) Padmanabhan and Cho (1999) KS (n.s.) Years, Subsidiary (n.s.) Years, Subsidiary (n.s.) Delios and Henisz (2000) Years, Subsidiary (s) Years, Subsidiary (s) Makino and Neupert (2000) Pan and Tse (2000) Brouthers and Brouthers (2001) H4…”
When Does Prior Experience Pay? Institutional Experience and the Multinational Corporation (2014, background): “This perspective emphasizes learning from the contextual heterogeneity among institutions (Kogut and Singh, 1988; Barkema, Bell, and Pennings, 1996; Delios and Henisz, 2000).”
Entry mode research: Past and future (2008, background): “Studies utilizing risk have investigated how risk will influence firm investment strategies (Brouthers, 1995; Delios & Henisz, 2000), and how perceived levels of risk will often predict levels of control by firms entering foreign markets (Ahmed, Mohamad, Tan, & Johnson, 2002; Anderson & Gatignon,…”
Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance hypothesis (2009, background): “Following Curhan, Davidson, and Suri (1977) and Delios and Henisz (2000), we measured the degree of subsidiary ownership as the percentage of each MNC subsidiary’s equity held by its headquarters.”
An institutional approach to cross-national distance (2010, background): “These variables have been found to correlate with the choice of foreign markets to enter, the choice of entry mode, and foreign direct investment flows (Delios & Henisz, 2000, 2003; Garcı́a-Canal & Guillén, 2008; Gastanaga et al., 1998; Henisz & Delios, 2001).”
What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective (2007, methodology): “and Dow (2003), Rose and Ito (2004) Delios and Henisz (2000),”