Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English

By Annelie Ädel. 2006

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/decd0f37898ee5f7ae5315751d26add17f7d0f5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Tomoyuki Kawase
2. Ken Hyland

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Tomoyuki Kawase
2. Ken Hyland
3. Douglas Biber

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Ken Hyland
2. Tomoyuki Kawase
3. Raffaella Negretti
4. Douglas Biber
5. A. Molino
6. Jim McKinley
7. Shih-Chieh Chien
8. Paul Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? (2017, methodology): “This idea has stimulated research into howmetadiscourse is used by students, so that Ädel (2006), for example, found considerable differences in metadiscourse use by advanced Swedish learners of English and native English writers and Hyland (2012) found undergraduates were far more reluctant to use…”
• Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching (2011, unknown): “(See, e.g., Ädel, 2006; Aijmer, 2009; Aston, 2001; Braun, Kohn, & Mukherjee, 2006; Campoy, Belles-Fortuño, & Gea-Valor, 2010; Gavioli, 2006; Granger, Hung, & Petch-Tyson, 2002; Kettemann & Marko, 2006; Lombardo, 2009; Reppen, 2010; Römer, 2005; Scott & Tribble, 2006; Sinclair, 2004a; and the…”
• Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles (2015, background): “…construct the rhetorical device of metadiscourse or “self-reflective linguistic expressions referring to the evolving texts, to the writer, and to the imagined reader of that text” (Hyland, 2004, p. 133; see also €Adel, 2006; Crismore, 1989; Crismore, Markkanen, & Steffensen, 1993; Mauranen, 1993).”