Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data

By P. Curran. 2016

1,152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Self-report data collections, particularly through online measures, are ubiquitous in both experimental and non- experimental psychology. Invalid data can be present in such data collections for a number of reasons. One reason is careless or insufficient effort (C/IE) responding. The past decade has seen a rise in research on techniques to detect and remove these data before normal analysis (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Meade & Craig, 2012). The rigorous use of these techniques is valuable tool for the removal of error that can impact survey results (Huang, Liu, & Bowling, 2015). This research has encompassed a number of sub-fields of psychology, and this paper aims to integrate different perspectives into a review and assessment of current tech- niques, an introduction of new techniques, and a generation of recommendations for practical use. Concerns about C/IE responding are a factor any time self-report data are collected, and all such researchers should be well-versed on methods to detect this pattern of response.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/deb576459476939eacb53937bacc9f42def17341

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Cheyna K. Brower
  2. Joseph W. Houpt
  3. N. Bowling
  4. Anthony Gibson
  5. Serge Petralito
  6. John V. Kane
  7. Peter Lucas Stöckli
  8. N. Kwok

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. N. Bowling
  2. Dominik J. Leiner
  3. Anthony Gibson
  4. Cheyna K. Brower
  5. Joseph W. Houpt
  6. P. D. Harms
  7. J. DeSimone
  8. Serge Petralito

Citations in the corpus