Toll financing in Norway: The success, the failures and perspectives for the future

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing (2007, background): “A typical ad hoc explanation for the observed shifts from negative attitudes before to rather positive attitudes after implementation of road pricing is that this is caused by the benefits (improvements) which have occurred after tolling has been introduced (Odeck and Brathen, 2002).”
Toward the Betterment of Risk Allocation: Investigating Risk Perceptions of Australian Stakeholder Groups to Public-Private-Partnership Tollroad Projects (2009, background): “There have been studies investigating users’ attitude towards road pricing (Odeck and Bråthen, 2002; Whitehead 2002).”
Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth (2004, background): “The problem of public acceptability is difficult, although not impossible, to overcome (Small 1992; Lex Services 1998; Odeck & Brathen 1997, 2002; Jones 1998; Ison 2000).”
The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt (2012, background): “…road pricing is likely to increase with familiarity (e.g. (Jones 2003)), and this is supported by empirical experience (for Norwegian experience, see (Tretvik 2003), (Odeck & Bråthen 1997), (Odeck & Bråthen 2002), (Odeck & Kjerkreit 2010); for London, see (Banister 2003) and (Georgina Santos 2008).”