Spatial interaction between seabirds and prey: review and synthesis
By P. Fauchald. 2009
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/316b980b50011ceda8fe9d828d6e4d2ccf61d25d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Oceanographic characteristics of areas used by Cory’s shearwaters during short and long foraging trips in the North Atlantic (2010, background): “Oceans are highly variable ecosystems, with patchy and unpredictable food resources (Ashmole 1971; Weimerskirch 2007), and seabirds must cope with fluctuations in oceanographic parameters and consequent variation in prey availability (Fauchald 2009).”
- Change in the Beaufort Sea ecosystem: Diverging trends in body condition and/or production in five marine vertebrate species (2015, background): “Well-funded, long-term research programs, using marine mammals and seabirds as ‘‘educated oceanographic sampling platforms’’ could be key to understanding the changes that are occurring in the Arctic marine ecosystem (Smith, 2001; Lydersen et al., 2002, 2004; Fedak, 2004).”
- Confusion reigns? A review of marine megafauna interactions with tidal-stream environments (2015, background): “…prey vulnerability, rather than prey abundance, drives seabirds’ foraging distributions at fine spatiotemporal scales (e.g. Fauchald et al. 2000, Fauchald 2009, Embling et al. 2012, Cox et al. 2013, Scott et al. 2013), and similar processes are thought to operate in marine mammal foraging…”
- Understanding what controls the spatial distribution of fish populations using a multi-model approach (2011, background): “Constraints imposed on the predator, due for example to inaccessibility to prey refugia, is expected to result in negative predator-prey relationships at specific 275 scale (Fauchald, 2009, Rose and Leggett, 1989).”