Overlap between vulnerable top predators and fisheries in the Benguela upwelling system: implications for marine protected areas

By L. Pichegru, P. Ryan, C. Bohec, C. Lingen, R. Navarro, S. Petersen, S. Lewis, J. V. D. Westhuizen, D. Grémillet. 2009

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Local depletion by a fishery can affect seabird foraging (2012, methodology): “As suggested by Crawford (2007) and Pichegru et al. (2009) for South African seabirds, establishing areas closed to fishing, at least temporarily during the breeding season, around the main seabird colonies seems a reasonable management option to consider.”
Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review (2009, unknown): “6; Harris J et al. 2007, Pichegru et al. 2009, this Theme Section).”
Industrial fishing, no-take zones and endangered penguins (2012, unknown): “It could be argued that a catch of 700–2000 tonnes would have a trivial ecological impact, especially when one considers that >25,000 tonnes of small pelagic fish are caught annually within the foraging range of African penguins breeding on Dyer Island on the south-west coast of South Africa (Picheg”
Influence of local and regional prey availability on breeding performance of African penguins Spheniscus demersus (2013, background): “…African penguins both target anchovy 297 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473: 291–301, 2013 recruits in the near-shore waters of the West Coast (Fairweather et al. 2006, Crawford et al. 2011), and the catch data were derived from the total fishing activity during the breeding season (Pichegru et al. 2009).”