The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations
By J. Block. 2010
294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c7481d97f38e4eb2cba370f46081888ea6cbee3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- L. Veselka
- J. Schermer
- Jan Cieciuch
- Włodzimierz Strus
- T. Piccinno
- Cinzia Modafferi
- Kristina Schmid Callina
- Mark S. Allen
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Kristina Schmid Callina
- J. Schermer
- L. Veselka
- Włodzimierz Strus
- T. Piccinno
- Cinzia Modafferi
- Jan Cieciuch
- Mark S. Allen
Citations in the corpus
- The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A Synthesizing Model of Personality Based on the Big Five (2014, methodology): “The Big Five model has been often criticized for being purely descriptive and atheoretical (Block, 1995, 2010; Digman, 1997; McAdams, 1992; Strelau, 2002).”
- The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality (2012, background): “Noticeably absent from the model are socially malevolent traits that may have once been considered impolite, and which were therefore not sufficiently captured in the lexical taxonomies upon which the FFM is based (Block, 2010).”
- A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage (2012, background): “Although the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of the model are not completely without dispute (see Block, 1995; 2010), it is regarded as acknowledging at least some of the essential aspects of personality (McCrae & Costa, 1999).”
- The Study of Character Development: Towards Tests of a Relational Developmental Systems Model (2015, background): “That is, these attributes reflect relations between individuals and contexts as they occur at particular times and places [Ardelt, 2000; Block, 1995, 2010; Elder, 1998; Elder et al., 2015; Roberts et al., 2006].”
- Personality in sport: a comprehensive review (2013, background): “Although not without its critics (see, for example, Block, 2010), the five-factor model has become the most widely accepted model of personality trait structure.”
- Psychometric Properties of a Revised Version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (2015, methodology): “The Five Factor Approach (FFA) to personality (as in Block, 2010, we use this generic term since it is not related to any specific group of researchers or instruments) has been accepted as a comprehensive conceptual framework for integrating all the research findings and theories in personality psyc”