Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity

By Joshua M. Tybur, A. Bryan, Debra Lieberman, Ann E. Caldwell Hooper, L. Merriman. 2011

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0894fa2c58fef7105481e75c6aaa02913d7d245d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Debra Lieberman
2. Joshua M. Tybur
3. Robert Kurzban
4. Peter DeScioli
5. Mark Schaller

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Debra Lieberman
2. Joshua M. Tybur
3. Robert Kurzban
4. Peter DeScioli
5. Mark Schaller

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Debra Lieberman
2. Robert Kurzban
3. Peter DeScioli
4. Joshua M. Tybur
5. Daniel M.T. Fessler

Citations in the corpus

• Disgust: evolved function and structure. (2013, background): “…direct costs, including tissue damage during intercourse , the risk of pathogen transmission, and social risks in the form of reputational damage and direct aggression from intrasexual competitors (see Hoffman et al., 2008; Penn & Smith, 2007; Perilloux et al., 2010; Tybur & Gangestad, 2011).”
• Behavioral immune system linked to responses to the threat of COVID-19 (2020, unknown): “Considering women tend to have higher overall levels of disgust sensitivity than men (Duncan et al., 2009; Haidt et al., 1994; Tybur et al., 2011), it is important to examine whether other factors that shape people's trait pathogen avoidance may be moderated by sex or gender.”