Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum

By W. E. Rogers, E. Siemann. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de0feedc4831be8405bb0b07374ee02842b2c493

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines (2007, background): “An alternate possibility is that invasive plants tolerate herbiv- ory more than native species (Schierenbeck et al ., 1994; Rogers & Siemann, 2003, 2004; Stastny et al ., 2005).”
Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum (2007, background): “Results of recent studies on S. sebiferum generally support the EICA hypothesis (Siemann & Rogers 2001, 2003a,b; Rogers & Siemann 2004, 2005; Zou et al. 2006), suggesting that Sapium has evolved to be a faster-growing, less herbivore-resistant plant in response to low herbivore loads in its…”
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “…for explaining sudden increases in dominance and impacts from long-established nonnatives, empirical evidence for it is mixed (DeWalt et al. 2004, Rogers and Siemann 2004, Franks et al. 2008), potentially because escape from enemies and evolution of increased competitive ability may take place…”
Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion (2005, background): “Having left behind its natural enemies, genotypes that improve competitive success will be selected for, and this will come at the expense of herbivore defence (Blossey & Notzöld, 1995; Siemann & Rogers, 2003; Rogers & Siemann, 2004, but see Coluatti et al., 2004).”
Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant (2010, background): “However, generalist herbivores in Triadica’s introduced range cause little damage (Lankau, Rogers & Siemann 2004) which perhaps makes it more likely that greater herbivore tolerance of invasive populations is the result of selection for rapid growth rate (i.e. there is not likely strong selection…”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Many studies have found at least partial support for the ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ (EICA) hypothesis which predicts that plants introduced into an environment that lacks their usual herbivores will experience selection favouring individuals that allocate less energy to defence and”
Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, background): “... (2005) Sapium sebiferum + 1/3 CG (no native herbivores) PB, tannins Siemann and Rogers 2001, 2003a 1/1 CG (with native herbivores) PB, tannins Siemann and Rogers 2003a + 2/1 CG Growth rates Siemann and Rogers (2003b) + 2/1 GR, HB (generalist) Growth rates, consumption Siemann and Rogers (2003b) ”
Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits (2011, background): “As for the EICA hypothesis, it was also supported through genetic evolution in invasive trees with positive and significant effect sizes detected here (Siemann and Rogers 2001; Rogers and Siemann 2004).”
Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions (2008, background): “…in introduced populations (e.g. Brown & Marshall 1981; Stockwell et al. 1996; Hendry & Quinn 1997; Huey et al. 2000; Koskinen et al. 2002a; Blair & Wolfe 2004; Rogers & Siemann 2004), and sometimes quite rapidly (e.g. Daehler & Strong 1997; reviewed in Thompson 1998; Reznick & Ghalambor 2001).”
Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? (2005, result): “Comparisons of herbivore tolerance of native vs. introduced populations have been largely neglected; our results are supported by a recent study of Rogers & Siemann (2004) in which invasive ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree showed increased tolerance, but are in contrast with the generally…”