Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits
By L. Lamarque, Sylvain Delzon, Christopher J. Lortie. Biological Invasions, 2011
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25ea8a9ac96bc517dd35d9539ceb48c6cca7b8f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Petr Pyšek
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- P. Genovesi
- V. Jarošı́k
- J. Loo
- D. Richardson
- P. Hulme
- Daniel Simberloff
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- General hypotheses in invasion ecology (2014, background): “These hypotheses were arbitrarily selected (see Catford et al., 2009; Lamarque et al., 2011; Jeschke et al., 2012a,b; Lockwood et al., 2013; Lowry et al., 2013; and references therein for other influential invasion hypotheses).”
- An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, background): “Germination performance of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations 55 Although more than 300 tree species are classified as invasive, there are comparatively few studies on their invasion success (Lamarque et al. 2011, Richardson and Rejmánek 2011).”
- Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: A global review (2014, background): “review of tree invasions, Lamarque et al. (2011) noted that large propagule pressure is often an important factor for an introduced”