Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness?
By M. Stastny, Urs Schaffner, E. Elle. 2005
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14c8f6efa2eb0e6e85c5bd39597c0566732b8c14
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- R. Callaway
- D. Richardson
- Petr Pyšek
- Jianwen Zou
- E. Siemann
- Scott P Carroll
- W. E. Rogers
- J. Klironomos
In Insect Science
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jianwen Zou
- E. Siemann
- W. E. Rogers
- J. L. Le Roux
- J. Klironomos
- Jorge M. Vivanco
In Molecular Biology
- Albert Rivas‐Ubach
- Josep Peñuelas
- D. Richardson
- A. Agrawal
- Helen E. Roy
- Scott P Carroll
- Petr Pyšek
- P. Kotanen
Citations in the corpus
- Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant (2010, background): “…Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; 4Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3225 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA; and 5College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing”
- Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. (2009, unknown): “a Wolfe et al. (2004); Stastny et al. (2005) ; Joshi and Vrieling (2005); Zou et al. (2008a, b). b Leger and Rice (2003); Leger and Rice (2007).”
- Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants (2005, background): “Ecology has been emphasized over evolution in research on the biological effects of exotic plant invasions (Rice & Emery 2003), and almost all evolutionary research on this topic has focused on the invaders themselves (Baker 1992; Ellstrand & Schierenbeck 2000; Siemann & Rogers 2001; Grosholz 2002; ”
- Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, unknown): “Senecio jacobaea 0 6/6 CG PB Willis et al. (2000) ± 13/16 HB (generalist/specialist) HP, HD, alkaloids J. Joshi, unpublished + 13/16 SH PB J. Joshi, unpublished + + 4/4 CG PF, HP, alkaloids Stastny et al. (2005)”
- ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “This loss of enemies can result in reduced levels of predation and parasitism on introduced compared to native species (Klironomos 2002, Daehler 2003), potentially allowing introduced species to outperform na- 2980 ANURAG A. AGRAWAL ET AL.”
- Ecological metabolomics: overview of current developments and future challenges (2011, background): “…of chemical defenses, which are effective against specialist herbivores, but metabolically demanding, and an increase in the concentrations of less costly qualitative defenses, which may be more toxic to generalist herbivores (Joshi and Vrieling 2005; Stastny et al. 2005; Peñuelas et al. 2010).”
- The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “Increased plant size has been suggested as an explanation for invasion success inducing increased competitiveness and vigour (Blossey and Nötzold, 1995; Jakobs et al., 2004; Stastny et al., 2005).”
- Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum (2008, background): “Ecological theory predicts a trade-off between resistance and tolerance, suggesting that reduced herbivory resistance may translate into increased tolerance to herbivory (Strauss and Agrawal 1999; Stowe et al. 2000; Stastny et al. 2005).”
- Can the enemy release hypothesis explain the success of invasive alien predators and parasitoids? (2011, background): “2002; Snyder and Ives 2003), this differentiation has been somewhat overlooked in the context of biological invasions (Stastny et al. 2005).”
- Natives adapting to invasive species: ecology, genes, and the sustainability of conservation (2007, background): “Yet introduced plants may also experience insect attack at rates similar to those of related natives (Agrawal and Kotanen 2003) and may even evolve increased tolerance to herbivory (Stastny et al. 2005).”
- Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines (2007, background): “…of invasive plants and natural enemies have focused on resistance (e.g. Agrawal et al ., 2005), but there has been a recent increase in the recognition that tolerance may also play a role in facilitating successful invasions (Rogers & Siemann, 2004; Murren et al ., 2005; Stastny et al ., 2005).”
- Host range of Tetramesa romana Walker (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), a potential biological control of giant reed, Arundo donax L. in North America (2009, background): “…and Mack, 1991; Willis et al., 2000), land and water management practices that facilitate invasion (Lite and Stromberg, 2005), and lack of coevolved herbivores (Stastny et al., 2005) have all likely aided the widespread naturalization of A. donax and other exotic riparian weeds in North America.”