Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations
By O. Bossdorf, H. Auge, Lucile Lafuma, W. E. Rogers, E. Siemann, D. Prati. Oecologia, 2005
1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bf1729c9e2dd08de80cea110548edbd3fd6791a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- R. Callaway
- W. H. van der Putten
- M. van Kleunen
- O. Bossdorf
- E. Siemann
- J. Maron
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- M. van Kleunen
- R. Callaway
- W. H. van der Putten
- E. Siemann
- Jan Pergl
- F. Valladares
In Plant Science
- Petr Pyšek
- W. H. van der Putten
- R. Callaway
- D. Richardson
- M. van Kleunen
- O. Bossdorf
- J. Maron
- J. Klironomos
Citations in the corpus
- Relaxed selection in the wild. (2009, background): “immediate (plastic) or evolutionary responses in the new environment [ 81 ].”
- Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “…evolve by genetic drift and inbreeding in founder populations, by intra- and interspecific hybridization in the introduced range creating novel genotypes, and by drastic changes in selection regimes imposed by novel environments that may cause adaptive evolutionary change (Bossdorf et al., 2005).”
- The worldwide expansion of the Argentine ant (2010, background): “…(Dlugosch & Parker, 2008; Puillandre et al., 2008), it is not universal and there is growing evidence for the importance of invasive populations being the result of multiple introductions, often including several native sources (Bossdorf et al., 2005; Suarez et al., 2008; Wilson et al., 2009).”
- Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions (2008, background): “…plants from introduced populations but only a few have demonstrated altered resource allocation patterns that may favor growth and reproduction and ultimately facilitate demographic expansion of populations in the introduced range (Bossdorf et al. 2005; Handley et al. 2008, and references therein).”
- Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species? (2011, background): “Many studies of rapid evolution in introduced plant species have focussed on rapid evolutionary changes caused by biotic processes such as competition and herbivory (Cox 2004; Bossdorf et al. 2005).”
- The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range (2007, background): “herbivores, and defence, but studies published so far have provided rather inconsistent evidence for this hypothesis (Bossdorf et al., 2005).”
- Adaptive geographical clines in the growth and defense of a native plant (2012, background): “…for the success of invasive species, the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA), suggests that rapid evolution of invasive species, in the absence of their enemies from the native range, will lead to greater competitive ability (Blossey and No ¨ tzold 1995, Bossdorf et al. 2005).”
- Enhanced allelopathy and competitive ability of invasive plant Solidago canadensis in its introduced range (2013, background): “Experiments have also demonstrated that about half of the reported invasive species have greater competitive ability in the introduced range than in the original range (Bossdorf et al. 2005).”
- Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions (2008, methodology): “Qualitative reviews of this work (Brown & Marshall 1981; Barrett & Richardson 1986; Gray 1986; Barrett & Husband 1990; Merilä et al. 1996b; Lee 2002; Cox 2004; Lambrinos 2004; Lee et al. 2004; Bossdorf et al. 2005; Novak & Mack 2005; Wares et al. 2005) have highlighted the variety of outcomes observ”
- An Inventory of Crop Wild Relatives of the United States (2013, background): “These examples demonstrate the potential value of novel variation in naturalized species (Bossdorf et al., 2005), which should not be neglected in inventories of useful plant species.”
- Germination responses of an invasive species in native and non-native ranges (2009, background): “…introduced with agricultural species, a history of multiple introductions and hybridization among previously allopatric populations appear to provide the required high genetic variation upon which selection might act (Ellstrand and Schierenbeck 2000, Bossdorf et al. 2005, Novak and Mack 2005).”
- Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity (2011, result): “While some studies support higher plasticity of invad- ers (Niinemets, Valladares & Ceulemans 2003; Schumacher et al. 2009; Davidson, Jennions & Nicotra 2011), others do not (Bossdorf et al. 2005; Peperkorn, Werner & Beyschlag 2005; Funk 2008).”
- Ecological and evolutionary responses of Mediterranean plants to global change. (2014, neutral): “…and life-history traits (Blair and Wolfe, 2004; Maron et al., 2004; Dlugosch and Parker, 2008), and reproductive traits (Lavergne and Molofsky, 2007; see Bossdorf et al., 2005; Matesanz et al., 2010 for further references on evolutionary changes between native and introduced plant populations).”