Bias and equivalence: Cross-cultural perspectives
By F. Vijver. 2001
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dde7522ffeba54a5bc9e5c3939ad8ee6dd5bcd4d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Elvira Cicognani
- Tim Gelhaar
- Miha Škerlavaj
- Vlado Dimovski
- A. Borge
- Hugo Zagoršek
- Madalena Cunha
- Darko Lončarić
Citations in the corpus
- Validity of the SDS-17 measure of social desirability in the American context (2006, background): “However, as is true for psychological measures in general (e.g., Van de Vijver, 2003), the validity of SDR measures may not be directly generalizable across cultures (e.g., Johnson & Van de Vijver, 2003).”
- Transactional and Transformational Leadership Impacts on Organizational Learning (2009, background): “In this way the influence of confounding and background variables was randomized and cancelled out, increasing the validity of the empirical findings (Van de Vijver 2003).”
- Adolescent coping with everyday stressors: A seven-nation study of youth from central, eastern, southern, and northern Europe (2007, background): “…values are far more meaningful than absolute means for determining cultural effects on coping, as differences in absolute means may be due to cultural differences in how easily people in different cultures use extreme values, independently of what is rated (Poortinga, 1989; van de Vijver, 2003).”