Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Name index

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? (2006, background): “Studies on the acquisition of L2 pragmatics have focused not only on the L2 learners’ comprehension and production of pragmatics but also on the development of L2 learners’ pragmatic abilities (Kasper and Dahl, 1991; Kasper and Blum-Kulka, 1993; Kasper and Schmidt, 1996; Bardovi-Harlig, 1999; Rose a”
Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and non-native English-speakers' production (2004, background): “…or speech acts, to achieve their communicative goals, including Searle’s seminal broad categories – classification, commissives, declarations, directives, expressives, and representatives – as well as more specific acts such as apologies, requests, complaints, and refusals (Kasper and Rose, 2001).”
Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics (2006, background): “…in a range of languages (for a comprehensive discussion, see Kasper and Rose, 2002), related pragmatic competence to other areas of second language competence (Salsbury and Bardovi-Harlig, 2001), and has recently begun a systematic foray into pragmatics instruction (e.g. Rose and Kasper, 2001).”