Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

By H. Levitt, M. Bamberg, J. D. Creswell, D. Frost, R. Josselson, Carola Suárez-Orozco. American Psychologist, 2018

1,934 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd820acdf346b77d9177b1d4f3c6c904abcc64f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. E. J. Gubbins
2. Carolyn M. Callahan
3. Herman Aguinis

In General Health Professions

1. Herman Aguinis

In Social Psychology

1. W. Sheate
2. Ute B. Thiermann
3. Carolyn M. Callahan
4. Herman Aguinis
5. N. S. Hill

Citations in the corpus

• Best Practices in Data Collection and Preparation: Recommendations for Reviewers, Editors, and Authors (2019, background): “…transparency, many published articles in management and related fields do not include sufficient information on precise steps, decisions, and judgment calls made during a scientific study (Aguinis, Ramani, & Alabduljader, 2018; Aguinis & Solarino, 2019; Appelbaum et al., 2018; Levitt et al., 2018).”
• Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, methodology): “We similarly value the emphasis in the qualitative tradition on inductive, open-ended discovery and recursive reflection (Levitt et al., 2018; Silverman, 2000).”
• One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020, neutral): “As Levitt et al. (2018) argued, quality expectations and contextualisation, research reflexivity and illustrating findings with data extracts demand more manuscript pages.”
• The Way Forward in Mindfulness and Sustainability: a Critical Review and Research Agenda (2020, methodology): “In all cases, the reporting of the qualitative and mixed methods research process should follow standard procedures of qualitative research (Levitt et al. 2018).”
• Family Engagement in Schools: Parent, Educator, and Community Perspectives (2020, methodology): “Methodological integrity was established through frequent self-correcting of the iterative analysis by the first author, and multiple cross-checking and triangulations between the authors throughout the process (Levitt et al., 2018).”