The duality of knowledge

By Paul M. Hildreth, Chris Kimble. Information Research, 2002

439 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory (2009, background): “" Hildreth and Kimble (2002) emphasize the importance of a mentor in the organization who has a lot of tacit knowledge and who guides the newcomer in learning this tacit knowledge through a practice.”
The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software (2007, background): “distinction has been made between structured and less structured knowledge (Davenport and Prusak, 1998), know what and know how (Seely Brown and Duguid, 1998) and hard and soft knowledge (Hildreth and Kimble, 2002).”
Social Learning and Water Resources Management (2007, background): “However, as pointed out by Hildreth and Kimble (2002), trying to make a clear distinction and create a dichotomy between tacit and explicit knowledge may not be useful, because knowledge always contains elements of both, albeit to a different degree depending on knowledge type and context.”