Diversification in context: a cross-national and cross-temporal extension

By M. Mayer, Richard Whittington. 2003

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc3bba61de3f9d18a5eb2c6fba8f484f37af895d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions (2008, background): “of corporate diversification, a question that immediately comestomindis:Isthediversificationpremiumfoundin emerging economies likely to hold over time ? ( Peng et al., 2005 ). The answer may be negative ( Kim, Hoskisson, Tihanyi, & Hong, 2004 ; Mayer & Whittington, 2003 ). Since 2002, studies with”
The Evolving Value of Foreign Partnerships in Transitioning Economies (2005, result): “Overall, our results complement those of other studies that have examined the influence of institutional and economic environment on firm boundaries and scope (e.g., Mayer & Whittington, 2003; Wan & Hoskisson, 2003) and knowledge transfer (Kostova & Roth, 1999).”
Does the Diversification–Firm Performance Relationship Change Over Time? A Meta‐Analytical Review (2018, unknown): “Five studies in our sample reported such observations (Grant and Jammine, 1988; Kaul, 2003; Lubatkin and Rogers, 1989; Mayer and Whittington, 2003; Servaes, 1996).”
What Determines the Scope of the Firm Over Time? A Focus on Institutional Relatedness (2005, background): “Therefore, conclusions reached by different studies may be influenced by their sample period (Mayer & Whittington, 2003).”
Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research* (2019, background): “…scholars might have concluded that diversified conglomerates were suboptimal forms of organizing, these kinds of companies have performed better over time as management technologies have improved (Grant, Jammine, and Thomas, 1988; Mayer and Whittington, 2003; Schommer, Richter, and Karna, 2019).”