Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?
By Avi J Cohen, G. Harcourt. 2003
442 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbd8f409449da9bafb433c9edf9cb365929fe5e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- A. Nölke
- J. Perry
- Stéphane Hallegatte
- Christos N. Pitelis
- Geoffrey M. Hodgson
- Thorbjørn Knudsen
- Christian Cordes
- Ulrich Witt
Citations in the corpus
- A Brief History of Production Functions (2007, unknown): “A much more comprehensive account of controversy may be found in Cohen and Harcourt (2003).”
- What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: should it be changed back? (2014, background): “Both sides of the Cambridge controversy treated capital as physical rather than essentially financial, with Cambridge UK insisting on the heterogeneity of capital goods and the problem of their measurement and aggregation (Sraffa 1960, Harcourt 1972, Robinson 1979, Cohen and Harcourt 2003).”
- THE INNOVATION†EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS (2016, unknown): “…of re-switching of the techniques due to multiple intersections of the isoquants (for a recent discussion on the Cambridge capital theory controversies, see Cohen and Harcourt, 2003) would allow, given the same relative prices, to have a coexistence of multiple capital/labour combinations.”
- Economic resilience: definition and measurement (2014, background): “This limits links to the Cambridge capital theory controversy, and the limits of the one-commodity model (Cohen and Harcourt, 2003).”
- The Co-Evolution of Organizational Value Capture, Value Creation and Sustainable Advantage (2009, background): “However, we propose that their contribution is indirect and operates through the four generic variables, especially human resources (Harcourt and Cohen 2003).”
- The political economy of International Accounting Standards (2006, background): “In this article we only cover what is important for our analysis of FVA; there are many fuller accounts of the Controversies and their implications for political economy (for a review of such literature see Cohen and Harcourt, 2003).”