Extrapolate-Ing: External Validity and Overidentification in the Late Framework
By J. Angrist, Iv'an Fern'andez-Val. 2010
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, General Health Professions
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jack Mountjoy
- C. Chaisemartin
- Ro’ee Levy
- Magne Mogstad
- Irina Degtiar
- Kosuke Imai
- Sherri Rose
- Christian N. Brinch
In Gender Studies
- Magne Mogstad
- Matthew Wiswall
- Jack Mountjoy
- Ro’ee Levy
- C. Chaisemartin
- Irina Degtiar
- Kosuke Imai
- Sherri Rose
In General Health Professions
- Jack Mountjoy
- Ro’ee Levy
- Magne Mogstad
- C. Chaisemartin
- Irina Degtiar
- Kosuke Imai
- Sherri Rose
- Christian N. Brinch
Citations in the corpus
- The State of Applied Econometrics - Causality and Policy Evaluation (2016, neutral): “Angrist and Fernandez-Val [2010] consider extrapolating local average treatment effects by exploiting the presence of other exogenous covariates.”
- External Validity in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs (2019, unknown): “The study has conditional external validity if, Gi ⊥ ( Yi(0), Yi(1) ) ∣∣∣ Xi, Vi (15) This is a generalized version of the “conditional effect ignorability” assumption of Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2010).”
- The Demand for Effective Charter Schools (2018, unknown): “Atheoretical covariate-based approaches to extrapolation reweight experimental or quasi-experimental treatment effect estimates to match the distribution of observed characteristics in a new population (see, e.g., Hotz, Imbens, and Mortimer 2005; Angrist and Fernandez-Val 2013).”
- Beyond LATE with a discrete instrument. Heterogeneity in the quantity-quality interaction of children (2012, methodology): “In contrast, the approaches to test the exernal validity of LATE proposed by Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2010), Heckman, Schmierer, and Urzua (2010), and Heckman and Schmierer (2010) require either two (or more) instruments or one instrument that takes multiple values.”
- Covariate balancing propensity score (2014, background): “Another potential application is the estimation of average treatment effects from the instrumental variable estimate (Angrist and Fernandez-Val, 2010).”
- Selection into Identification in Fixed Effects Models, with Application to Head Start (2019, unknown): “Analogous assumptions are made in the IV literature extrapolating from compliers to a target population (Angrist and Fernandez-Val 2013; Aronow and Carnegie 2013).”
- Community Colleges and Upward Mobility (2019, background): “(31)Heckman and Urzua (2010), Hull (2018b), and Kline and Walters (2016) provide related derivations, as do Angrist and Imbens (1995) for the case of ordered multivalued treatments.”
- Racial Bias in Bail Decisions ⇤ (2018, unknown): “[4] Angrist, Joshua, and Iván Fernández-Val, “ExtrapoLATE-ing: External Validity and Overidentification in the LATE Framework,” in Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Volume 3, Econometrics: Tenth World Congress, Cambridge University Press, 51 (2013), 401-434.”
- A Review of Generalizability and Transportability (2021, methodology): “…can use nonparametric post-stratification (also known as direct adjustment or subclassification), as has been done in the literature with randomized data (Miettinen, 1972; Prentice et al., 2005) and with observational data in the context of instrumental variables (Angrist and Fernández-Val, 2013).”
- Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument (2017, methodology): “…remain nearly uninformative even if we impose the IV assumptions. beyond late with a discrete instrument 987 everyone with the same observed characteristics or that treatment effects vary but individuals do not sort on the unobserved gain from treatment (see, e.g., Angrist and Fernandez-Val 2013).”
- Tolerating defiance? Local average treatment effects without monotonicity (2017, methodology): “…be summarized as follows: reporting only the bounds might leave out relevant information; the LATE of compliers can give researchers an idea of the magnitude of the treatment effect; under some assumptions this LATE can be extrapolated to other populations (see Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2013)).”
- Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation (2018, unknown): “For a discussion of extrapolation of LATE estimates and related problems, see Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2013).”
- Causal Effects of Paternity Leave on Children and Parents (2015, unknown): “This is obtained by taking the ratio of the first stage across a particular covariate group to the overall first-stage (Angrist and Pischke (2009), Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2010)).”
- From Local to Global: External Validity in a Fertility Natural Experiment (2015, unknown): “Angrist (2004), Angrist and Fernandez-Val (2010), and Aronow and Carnegie (2013) considered extrapolation from local average treatment effects identified by instrumental variables to a target population.”
- Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2020, background): “The reweighted estimates measure the average treatment effect under the conditional effect ignorability assumption (Angrist and Fernandez-Val, 2013; Aronow and Carnegie, 2013).”