Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument

By Christian N. Brinch, Magne Mogstad, Matthew Wiswall. Journal of Political Economy, 2017

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d31ceab50f0ce6ba34f486a6b31e9b9158e2d61c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Gender Studies

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Sensitivity analysis using approximate moment condition models (2018, methodology): “Local misspecification has been used in a number of papers, which include, among others, Newey (1985), Berkowitz, Caner, and Fang (2012), Conley, Hansen, and Rossi (2012), Guggenberger (2012), and Bugni and Ura (2019), and has antecedents in the literature on robust statistics (see Huber and Ronchet”
Testing the quantity–quality model of fertility: Estimation using unrestricted family size models (2016, background): “Brinch, Mogstad, and Wiswall (2014) investigate heterogeneity in the effects of family size.”
Quantile Selection Models with an Application to Understanding Changes in Wage Inequality (2017, methodology): “The bounds in (10) and (11) coincide with the choice of the upper or lower Fréchet bounds for the copula of (U, V ).”
Racial Bias in Bail Decisions ⇤ (2018, unknown): “In this scenario, we will overestimate the probability of pre-trial misconduct for black versus white defendants at the margin and, as a Brinch et al. 2017).”
Incarceration, Recidivism, and Employment (2016, methodology): “Following Brinch et al. (2017), we assume separability between observed and unobserved heterogeneity in the treatment effects. Together with the assumption of an exogenous instrument that satisfies monotonicity, this restriction on the potential outcomes is sufficient to allow point identification o”
Using Instrumental Variables for Inference About Policy Relevant Treatment Effects (2018, unknown): “Recent work by Brinch et al. (2015) has developed sufficient conditions under which this type of basis representation can lead to point identification. Similar parametric assumptions have been employed by French and Song (2014). Kowalski (2016) applies the linear case, studied in depth by Brinch et ”
From Late to MTE: Alternative Methods for the Evaluation of Policy Interventions (2016, background): “one can, in addition to the conditional independence assumption, assume additive separability between an observed and an unobserved component in the expected potential outcomes conditional on UD = uD (Brinch et al., 2015): E(Yj|Xi = x, UDi = uD) = Xiβj + E(Uji|UDi), j = 0,1 Both, the full independen”
Community Colleges and Upward Mobility (2019, unknown): “4 Moving beyond local treatment effects, instruments that take on a range of values enable identification of causal effects for a wider range of compliers, as in the binary treatment IV setting (Heckman et al., 2010; Angrist and Fernández-Val, 2013; Brinch et al., 2017).”
Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation (2018, background): “…variables (and other program evaluation) settings was introduced by Björklund and Moffitt (1987), and later devel- oped and popularized by Heckman and Vytlacil (1999, 2005) and Heckman et al. (2006), and more recently studied by Kline and Walters (2016) and Brinch et al. (2017), among others.”