From Local to Global: External Validity in a Fertility Natural Experiment

By Rajeev Dehejia, Cristian Pop-Eleches, Cyrus Samii. Journal of business & economic statistics, 2015

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We study issues related to external validity for treatment effects using over 100 replications of the Angrist and Evans natural experiment on the effects of sibling sex composition on fertility and labor supply. The replications are based on census data from around the world going back to 1960. We decompose sources of error in predicting treatment effects in external contexts in terms of macro and micro sources of variation. In our empirical setting, we find that macro covariates dominate over micro covariates for reducing errors in predicting treatments, an issue that past studies of external validity have been unable to evaluate. We develop methods for two applications to evidence-based decision-making, including determining where to locate an experiment and whether policy-makers should commission new experiments or rely on an existing evidence base for making a policy decision.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5a0143601d94df087ac14d7ea135a9d68eddab1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

  1. Maria Abascal
  2. Alessandra Voena
  3. L. Corno
  4. N. Hildebrandt
  5. Delia Baldassarri

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Maria Abascal
  2. Delia Baldassarri

Citations in the corpus