Linking entrepreneurship to growth
By David B. Audretsch, Roy Thurik. 2001
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db2b5126a3ad60dd03ccfd61975e086e5566f22d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David B. Audretsch
- Zoltan J. Acs
- David Urbano
- Roy Thurik
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Robert Huggins
- Piers Thompson
- Martin A. Carree
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David B. Audretsch
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Roy Thurik
- David Urbano
- Piers Thompson
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Martin A. Carree
- Simon C. Parker
Citations in the corpus
- Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity (2011, neutral): “The results also reflect the structural change towards an entrepreneurial economy as proposed by Audretsch and Thurik (2001).”
- Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea (2014, neutral): “Keilbach, 2004; Audretsch and Thurik, 2001; Shane, 2000; Kirzner, 1997; Grossman and Helpman, 1994).”
- Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: The Creation and Development of New Firms in Latin America and East Asia (2002, background): “The particular ability of entrepreneurship to promote economic growth is emphasized by Audretsch and Thurik (2001), who also present further empirical evidence regarding the relationship between the level of”
- Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence (2008, background): “…betweens institutions (and economic policies) and growth (e.g., Olson, 1982; Barro, 1991; Sachs and Warner, 1997), and there has also been some interest in linking entrepreneurship and growth (Aghion and Howitt, 1992; Wennekers and Thurik, 1999; Audretsch and Thurik, 2001; Carree and Thurik, 2002).”
- Entrepreneurship and SME growth: evidence from advanced and laggard transition economies (2011, background): “Although new growth theories are not directly concerned with entrepreneurship and small firms, many authors have identified these as the key mechanisms through which knowledge spill-over contributes to job creation and the overall growth of the economy (Wennekers and Thurik, 1999; Schmitz, 1989; Noo”
- What Kind of Entrepreneurship Drives Regional Development in European Non-core Regions? A Literature Review on Empirical Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “Such endogenous development may be fostered on the local (Julien, 2007), the regional (Acs & Storey, 2004; Fritsch & Schmude, 2006) and the national scale (Audretsch & Thurik, 2001).”
- Urban Economics and Entrepreneurship (2009, neutral): “This preliminary evidence suggests that in thinking about the impacts of entrepreneurship, the ownership dimension might not be as important as the size dimension. at the country level, as in Audretsch and Thurik (2001) and Audretsch et al. (2006).”
- The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth (2010, background): “6 See, for instance, Callejon and Segarra (1999), Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), Acs and Armington (2004), Audretsch and Keilbach (2004), Braunerhjelm and Borgman (2004), and Beck et al.”
- Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: a comparative study of two countries university students (2009, neutral): “A considerable body of research has sought to understand the determinant factors of the supply side of entrepreneurial activity (Brock and Evans 1989; Storey 1999; Audretsch and Thurik 2001; Grilo and Thurik 2004; Thurik and Wennekers 2004; Bowen and Clercq 2005).”
- Entrepreneurship - A Survey of the Literature - (2006, background): “Source: Audretsch et al. (2002b) 31 The actual rate of entrepreneurship (E) is determined by both macro and micro factors.”
- Intrapreneurship or Entrepreneurship? (2009, neutral): “This can allow independent entrepreneurship to exploit profitable (though possibly short-lived) niches (Audretsch and Thurik, 2001; Freeman and Engel, 2007).”
- Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship (2004, background): “In a study for the OECD, Audretsch and Thurik (2002) undertake two separate empirical analyses to identify the impact of changes of entrepreneurship on growth.”
- The Cluster Policies Whitebook (2004, background): “…in young and small firms.32 Several studies have pointed to the impetus of entrepreneurship and SMEs on competition, the commercialisation of technologies, and innovation (Henderson and Clarke, 1990; Jovanovic and Nyarko, 1996; Baldwin and Johnson, 1999; Audretsch and Thurik, 2001, OECD, 2001e).”
- The Process of Creative Construction: Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth (2007, neutral): “While Audretsch and Thurik (2001) and Acs et al. (2004) show that the process of creative destruction creates value at a localized level, recent research has identifi ed spillovers as a mechanism through which failure creates value.”
- Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory (2015, background): “At the same time, it is increasingly suggested that entrepreneurship is also a key source of such growth (Audretsch and Thurik 2001; Audretsch and Keilbach 2004a, b; Audretsch et al. 2006).”
- The Economics of Entrepreneurship: What We Know and What We Don't (2005, methodology): “For example, Audretsch and Thurik [18] and Acs et al [1] recently regressed economic growth rates”
- Religious institutions and entrepreneurship (2014, background): “This question has been examined through the lens of economic, technological, demographic, cultural and institutional variables (Acs et al. 2004; Audretsch and Thurik 2001; Bosma and Harding 2006; Bosma et al. 2007; Minniti et al. 2005; Reynolds et al. 2002; Reynolds et al. 2003; Thomas and Mueller…”
- Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption (2009, background): “For example, the effects of wealth are not uniform across nations because wealth is not distributed identically within each nation (Audretsch and Thurik, 2001; Olsen, 1996).”