Egalitarianism and Competitiveness

By Björn Bartling, Ernst Fehr, Michel André Maréchal, Daniel W. Schunk. 2009

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db1ab334ea90ca27667379b4d8ee158797cae0cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Gender Studies

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck (2012, unknown): “…across gender (as measured by responses to hypothetical scenarios) explains a portion of the gender gap in selection into tournaments, while Bartling et al. (2009) and Buser (2009) find that more risk averse females choose to compete significantly less frequently than those that are less…”
SIMULTANEOUS DECISION‐MAKING IN COMPETITIVE AND COOPERATIVE ENVIRONMENTS (2013, unknown): “This finding is also in line with related work on social preferences and sorting into competitive environments (Dohmen and Falk, 2011; Bartling et al., 2009; Teyssier, 2009).”
Overbidding and Heterogeneous Behavior in Contest Experiments (2013, unknown): “Related to the utility of winning, studies show that overbidding may be driven by spiteful preferences and inequality aversion (Herrmann and Orzen, 2008; Bartling et al., 2009; Fonseca, 2009; Cason et al., 2011; Balafoutas et al., 2012; Mago et al., 2012).”
Gender and Competition (2011, background): “Bartling et al. (2009) use four allocation decisions between self and others to classify participants as egalitarian or not egalitarian.”
Gender gap in latent and nascent entrepreneurship: driven by competitiveness (2013, result): “While Bartling et al. (2009) report that competitiveness is related to agreeableness, the results reported by Müller and Schwieren (2012) suggest that it is related to neuroticism.”
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments (2014, methodology): “behavior similar to the real-effort experiments of Ludwig and Lünser (2012) and Kuhnen and Tymula (2012).(35) Given that feedback can sometimes have a significant effect on effort, the principal may have an incentive to misreport intermediate information to the contestants (Ederer, 2010).”
Sorting in Experiments with Application to Social Preferences (2019, background): “2005), incentive contracts (Eriksson and Villeval 2004; Dohmen and Falk 2006), auctions (Palfrey and Pevnitskaya 2008), risky choices (Harrison, Lau, and Rutström 2009), partner selection in trust and dictator games (Slonim and Garbarino 2008), and entry into competitive environments (Camerer and Lo”
Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences (2012, background): “, 2004a,b; Ben-Ner and Kramer, 2011), ultimatum games (Brandstätter and Königstein, 2001) and a series of distribution games (Bartling et al., 2009).”