Resource Impact: Curse or Blessing? A Literature Survey

By P. Stevens. 2003

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa654a9dcc7824ec4dd23b27e2cdeed0919ded9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Shuai Shao
2. Lili Yang
3. E. Gilberthorpe
4. J. Weber
5. E. Papyrakis
6. Erling Røed Larsen
7. S. Ville
8. E. Dietsche

Citations in the corpus

• Escaping the Resource Curse and the Dutch Disease? When and Why Norway Caught up with and Forged ahead of Its Neighbors (2006, background): “Stevens (2003) offers a survey of the literature, and shows that there are only few exceptions to the curse and the disease, and none of them are fully understood.”
• Resource curse: An analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward (2007, background): “This poor outcome—dubbed the resource curse—has motivated a vast body of literature that has already been summarised (Ross, 1999; Stevens, 2003, 2006; ODI, 2006; Rosser, 2006a; Weinthal and Luong, 2006; Humphreys et al., 2007).”
• Natural resource dependence, human capital accumulation, and economic growth: A combined explanation for the resource curse and the resource blessing (2014, background): “…Indonesia had successfully evaded adverse effects of the oil export boom on human capital accumulation and growth and achieved virtuous economic development through a series of measures, such as enhancing education and supporting the development of export-oriented manufacturing (Stevens, 2003).”
• The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming ☆ (2012, background): “Much research explores how a country's economic dependence on natural resources affects its institutions and economic growth (see Stevens (2003) for an overview).”
• Are Rich Countries Immune to the Resource Curse? Evidence from Norway's Management of Its Oil Riches (2003, background): “There is a growing body of literature on this paradox, recently surveyed by Stevens (2003).”
• The Dynamics of Resource-Based Economic Development: Evidence from Australia and Norway (2013, background): “A share of net visible exports of anywhere between 20 and 40 per cent has been variously suggested as defining a resource-based economy (Stevens, 2003; Nankani, 1979).”
• The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “Two other early review papers by Gylfason (2001b) and Stevens (2003) primarily focused on the economic explanations of the curse.”
• Does the 'Resource Curse' Hold for Growth in Genuine Income as Well? (2004, unknown): “2 See Stevens (2003) for a survey.”