Natural resource dependence, human capital accumulation, and economic growth: A combined explanation for the resource curse and the resource blessing

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey (2017, background): “This broader set of outcome variables include human capital development (Gylfason, 2001; Stijns, 2006; Daniele, 2011; Blanco and Grier, 2012 and Shao and Yang, 2014), savings rates (Atkinson and Hamilton, 2003; Gylfason and Zoege, 2006; Dietz et al., 2007 Boos and Holm-Müller, 2013), growth of…”
Structural transformation of manufacturing, natural resource dependence, and carbon emissions reduction: Evidence of a threshold effect from China (2019, background): “Therefore, the above indicators can fully reflect the dependence of a city on local resources from an employment perspective (Shao and Yang, 2014).”
The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “…in GDP or school enrolment rates) have been found to correlate negatively with proxies of mineral abundance (Gylfason, 2001a relates this to the fact that extractive industries are often less human capital intensive; see also Birdsall et al., 2001; Papyrakis and Gerlagh, 2004; Shao and Yang, 2014).”