Resource curse: An analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward

By P. Stevens, E. Dietsche. 2007

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a740f6fbcbd07624df1c512c7811a47804d91e64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Tina Søreide
2. Nathan Andrews
3. Ivar Kolstad
4. Benjamin Sovacool
5. C. Corrigan

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Tina Søreide
2. Nathan Andrews
3. Ivar Kolstad
4. Benjamin Sovacool
5. C. Corrigan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Tina Søreide
2. Nathan Andrews
3. Ivar Kolstad
4. Benjamin Sovacool
5. C. Corrigan

Citations in the corpus

• Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia (2015, background): “In fact the extent of the ‘curse’ is said to be determined by the nature of rent seeking, the types of resources in question, and political incentives, among others (Robinson et al., 2014; Mehlum et al., 2006; Stevens and Dietsche, 2008).”
• Corruption in natural resource management: Implications for policy makers (2009, background): “There is therefore a need to better understand the political economy of institutional reform in resource-rich countries in order to identify potential opportunities for putting their economies on more favourable trajectories (Stevens and Dietsche, 2008; Kolstad and Wiig, 2008).”