Does the 'Resource Curse' Hold for Growth in Genuine Income as Well?

By Eric Neumayer. 2004

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e5cbccbbb4058b7da470d685ccc2433d1dd9fe9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Cursing the blessings? Natural resource abundance, institutions, and economic growth (2008, unknown): “Neumayer (2004) introduces another variation on the resource curse theme: although still using SW’s resource exports variable, he takes growth in genuine income, i.e. GDP minus depreciation of produced capital, as the dependent variable to ﬁnd a negative, albeit weakened, resource eﬀect.”
The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “…have also linked mineral wealth to low scores of sustainable development indicators (such as the genuine savings and genuine income measurements that calculate net savings and income taking into account the rate of mineral depletion; see Atkinson, 2003; Dietz et al., 2007; Neumayer, 2004).”
Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates (2006, background): “Some authors have rejected this second notion in favour of the ‘resource curse’ hypothesis, which states that large endowments of natural resources serve to reduce, rather than enhance, economic growth (e.g. Sachs and Warner, 1995, 2001; Neumayer, 2004).”
The resource curse revisited and revised (2006, unknown): “[4,21,36] suggest that the overall growth curse remains, although Ref.”
The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainability: A Panel Data Analysis (2014, unknown): “…income variable in the original EKC model (i.e., gross domestic product “GDP”) with HD Index (HDI) and to also replace emissions with a measure of macroeconomic sustainability such as the Genuine Saving (GS) index1 (Neumayer, 2004; Costantini and Monni, 2008; Costantini and Martini, 2010).”
Extending the concept of the resource curse: natural resources and public spending on health (2014, background): “Neumayer (2004) concludes that the resource curse holds for “genuine income”1 as well.”
How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? (2018, background): “Neumayer (2004) postulates that it is necessary to consider how technical change can work to overcome apparent scarcity of limits3.”
Environment, Human Development and Economic Growth (2008, methodology): “Among resource-rich countries, empirical evidence has shown that those countries with the highest (resource wealth adjusted) savings rate generally have managed to escape the resource curse (Atkinson and Hamilton, 2003; Boyce and Emery, 2005; Neumayer, 2004).”
The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey (2017, background): “As summarized by Sachs and Warner (1995), Gylfason (2001), Papyrakis and Gerlagh, (2004) and Frankel (2010), the Dutch disease occurs when natural resource booms increase domestic”