ZSim: fast and accurate microarchitectural simulation of thousand-core systems

By Daniel Sánchez, Christos Kozyrakis. International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2013

650 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Architectural simulation is time-consuming, and the trend towards hundreds of cores is making sequential simulation even slower. Existing parallel simulation techniques either scale poorly due to excessive synchronization, or sacrifice accuracy by allowing event reordering and using simplistic contention models. As a result, most researchers use sequential simulators and model small-scale systems with 16-32 cores. With 100-core chips already available, developing simulators that scale to thousands of cores is crucial. We present three novel techniques that, together, make thousand-core simulation practical. First, we speed up detailed core models (including OOO cores) with instruction-driven timing models that leverage dynamic binary translation. Second, we introduce bound-weave, a two-phase parallelization technique that scales parallel simulation on multicore hosts efficiently with minimal loss of accuracy. Third, we implement lightweight user-level virtualization to support complex workloads, including multiprogrammed, client-server, and managed-runtime applications, without the need for full-system simulation, sidestepping the lack of scalable OSs and ISAs that support thousands of cores. We use these techniques to build zsim, a fast, scalable, and accurate simulator. On a 16-core host, zsim models a 1024-core chip at speeds of up to 1,500 MIPS using simple cores and up to 300 MIPS using detailed OOO cores, 2-3 orders of magnitude faster than existing parallel simulators. Simulator performance scales well with both the number of modeled cores and the number of host cores. We validate zsim against a real Westmere system on a wide variety of workloads, and find performance and microarchitectural events to be within a narrow range of the real system.

Subfields: Hardware and Architecture, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9c91cd78453345e84db52bea42294acc2f85223

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Hardware and Architecture

  1. Onur Mutlu
  2. Rachata Ausavarungnirun
  3. Saugata Ghose
  4. Juan Gómez-Luna
  5. Joel S. Emer
  6. Mark A. Horowitz
  7. Lieven Eeckhout
  8. Wim Heirman

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Christos Kozyrakis

Citations in the corpus