Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity
By S. Feldman, Christopher D. Johnston. 2014
649 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31c74467b6b475065b69312562676f7472ed5b32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- A. Krouwel
- Philip T. Dunwoody
- Dorottya Lantos
- J. Prooijen
- Karolina Dyduch-Hazar
- John T. Jost
- F. Funke
- Agnieszka Golec de Zavala
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jungseock Joo
- A. Krouwel
- Dorottya Lantos
- Philip T. Dunwoody
- J. Prooijen
- Youssef Chetioui
- Hind Lebdaoui
- Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld
Citations in the corpus
- The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism (2016, positive): “Similarly, Hetherington and Weiler (2009) argued that the close relationship between religion and authoritarianism is one factor that has aided in the development of authoritarianism as a partisan divide in the U.”
- Facebook advertising, eWOM and consumer purchase intention-Evidence from a collectivistic emerging market (2021, background): “Several studies have subsequently revealed a positive impact of corporate reputation on consumers’ purchase intentions and behaviors (Clinton et al., 2008; Feldman & Johnston, 2014; Keh & Xie, 2009; Lafferty & Goldsmith, 1999).”
- Does Extreme Political Ideology Predict Conspiracy Beliefs, Economic Evaluations and Political Trust? Evidence From Sweden (2017, positive): “The findings of Feldman and Johnston (2014) show a differentiation between the cultural and economic dimension of political ideology, which is crucial for understanding ideology in modern societies.”
- Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019, background): “Future studies may explore whether collective narcissism corresponds to a unique dimension of political orientation, independent of preference for equality versus inequality (corresponding to individual difference in social dominance orientation) and to preference for openness versus conformity (cor”
- Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology (2017, background): “3) Aren’t the psychological correlates of social versus economic conservatism very different from one another (Crowson, 2009; Feldman & Johnston, 2014; Malka, Soto, Inzlicht, & Lelkes, 2014)?”
- Understanding the Political Ideology of Legislators from Social Media Images (2019, background): “These dimensions manifest as strong affinities toward nationalism, capitalism, and status quo political and economic institutions (Feldman and Johnston, 2014).”
- Reactionary Politics: Explaining the Psychological Roots of Anti Preferences in European Integration and Immigration Debates (2018, background): “These constructs are interlinked and empirically difficult to distinguish: the desire for certainty and security (values) is high among conservatives (ideology) who also score high on conscientiousness and low on openness to experiences (personality) (Feldman, 2003; Feldman & Johnston, 2014).”